TEACHERS in Flintshire could soon be asked to swear an oath pledging not to form inappropriate relationships with pupils, under a controversial motion set to be considered by the local council.
The proposal, due to be debated by Flintshire County Council in Mold on Tuesday, would require teachers and school staff to make a formal declaration in front of a manager, affirming they will not engage in intimate relationships with students. This comes in the wake of the high-profile case of former headteacher Neil Foden, who was sentenced to 17 years in prison in July after being found guilty of sexually abusing four girls during his tenure in Gwynedd.
The motion, submitted by Councillor Gladys Healey, a member of the Labour Party representing Hope, aims to introduce stronger safeguards to protect children from the risk of abuse by teachers. Healey argues that despite existing safeguarding measures, such as the code of professional conduct established by the Education Workforce Council, incidents of abuse and inappropriate relationships involving educators persist.
“The council acknowledges that even with safeguarding training and a strict professional code, there are still cases where teachers abuse their position,” Councillor Healey stated. “The council deplores such actions, which rob children of their innocence and bring the profession into disrepute.”
If passed, the measure would see all current and future education staff in Flintshire required to take the oath, reinforcing their commitment to the safeguarding of students.
However, the proposal has sparked outrage from teaching unions, who argue that it is unnecessary and an insult to the profession. The National Association of Schoolmasters Union of Women Teachers (NASUWT) expressed its strong opposition, with Neil Butler, the union’s national official for Wales, describing the motion as damaging to the reputation of teachers.
“This motion serves only to bring the teaching profession into disrepute,” Butler said. “Teachers in Wales are already bound by the Education Workforce’s code of practice, which clearly outlines their duty of care for the safety and wellbeing of learners. Those who breach this code face serious disciplinary consequences, including dismissal. Introducing an additional oath shows a shocking contempt for the profession.”
The Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) has taken a more measured stance, expressing a willingness to engage in discussions about the proposal. Claire Armitstead, ASCL Cymru’s director, stated: “We share the horror felt at the case that has prompted this motion. We are open to considering any proposal aimed at improving safeguarding measures for young people, and we welcome further discussions with Councillor Healey on this matter.”
A child practice review is currently underway, led by the North Wales Safeguarding Board, following Foden’s conviction. Cyngor Gwynedd, the local authority where the offences took place, has pledged full cooperation with the review, which is seen as a crucial step in strengthening protections for vulnerable children in North Wales.
The chair of the North Wales Safeguarding Board described the review as “vital” to ensuring the safety of children in the region, but critics fear that existing measures may still fall short.
The full council meeting on Tuesday is expected to draw heated debate on the proposed oath, with educators, unions, and officials weighing in on its potential impact on the profession and the safeguarding of pupils.
Responding, Laura Doel, national secretary at NAHT Cymru, said: “Everyone in the teaching profession was appalled by the abhorrent abuse perpetrated in Gwynedd, and our thoughts are with the victims.
“There are already strict safeguarding procedures in place to protect children and ensuring they are adhered to by all is the most appropriate and effective way to deal with any concerns, not to mention perpetrators facing criminal prosecution. We need meaningful action that strengthens safeguarding, not symbolic gestures that do not keep children safe.
“I am deeply disturbed to hear that a proposal to consider asking teachers to take an oath is being considered, let alone discussed. This sends the wrong message to the public and not only does it bring the whole profession into disrepute, it is an insult to the thousands of dedicated teachers and leaders who go above and beyond for their learners, their schools and the communities they serve.
“To enforce something like this insinuates all teachers and leaders cannot be trusted, and our learners are not safe in their care. That is simply not true and grossly unfair to the profession.
“Asking them to swear an oath promising not to abuse children will achieve nothing and risks undermining the trust between teachers, school leaders, and families.”
