Home » Cuts to Rural Affairs budget causes farmers concern
Aberystwyth Anglesey Bridgend Caerphilly Cardiff Carmarthenshire Ceredigion Conwy Denbighshire Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Farming Flintshire Gwynedd Llanelli Merthyr Tydfil Mid Wales Monmouthshire Neath Port Talbot Newport North Wales Pembrokeshire Politics Powys Rhondda Cynon Taf South Wales Swansea Torfaen Vale of Glamorgan West Wales Wrexham

Cuts to Rural Affairs budget causes farmers concern

BY THE time you read this column, Christmas will have been and gone, and I hope you all enjoyed a wonderful time with family and friends and, whilst the daily jobs of farming don’t stop on Christmas day, you managed to get a bit of rest. 

Our Grand Council met for the final time this year a few weeks ago. The hot topic of discussion among all our delegates was that there are major cuts to the Welsh Government’s Rural Affairs budget and delegates were also concerned about potential further losses if Rural Development Programme funds are not spent.

The Welsh Government recently published its latest draft budget for the 2023-24 financial year, showing a significant difference in budget amounts and allocations since the indicative budget was published in March.

While the UK Government’s Autumn Statement resulted in a further £666 million in funding for the Welsh Government in 2023-24, the Welsh Government proposes cutting its rural affairs budget by nearly nine million pounds.

Glyn Roberts: Budget cut for Rural Affairs concerns FUW President and Grand Council

The fact that the budget allocation for rural affairs has decreased considerably in the draft budget whilst the Welsh budget has increased in nominal terms represents a major concern for our members.

We fully appreciate that the increase in Wales’ block grant represents a real term fall in funding due to the high rate of inflation – but the high rate of inflation also means that the nominal cut of almost £9 million to the rural affairs budget represents an even larger cut in real terms.

The decision is extremely concerning given the important work undertaken by the Welsh Government’s rural affairs department at a time of major transitions and pressures for farmers and the rural communities they support.

Despite such concerns, we welcomed the Welsh Government’s commitment to maintaining a total budget of £238m for direct payments in 2023 and 2024, highlighting that this stood in stark contrast to the situation in England, where such payments have been cut by an average of more than 20% in 2022 and are due to be further cut in 2023.

However, it must be noted that the £238 million represents a significant real-term fall for Welsh farms given the current rate of inflation – especially when we consider the latest figures show the price index for agricultural inputs increased by 28.3% in the 12 months to October while increases in farmgate prices came nowhere close to this figure.

During that meeting, we also discussed concerns that if the Rural Development Programme funding is not spent by June 2023, Wales would have to return monies to the European Union.

online casinos UK

According to the latest figures, in September 2022, 20% of Wales’ RDP budget – around £181 million – remained unspent. £103 million is made up of EU funds, including £45 million taken from farm payments through the 15% Pillar 1 to Pillar 2 Transfer mechanism.

We understand that all unspent funds that derive from the EU must be returned if they have not been spent by June 2023, including money taken from farmers through the 15% Pillar Transfer.  Therefore, the Welsh Government must ensure that all RDP funds are spent by the deadline.

It would be particularly galling if, having in 2014 introduced the highest level of ‘tax’ on farm payments in the whole of the EU at 15% to fund what was claimed would be a radical Rural Development Programme, Wales and Welsh farmers end up losing funding because money has to be sent back to the EU.

Author